Pirates and fishermen: Is less patrolling always bad?

Citation data:

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, ISSN: 0167-2681, Vol: 81, Issue: 1, Page: 29-38

Publication Year:
2012
Usage 1091
Abstract Views 1057
Link-outs 20
Downloads 14
Captures 41
Exports-Saves 22
Readers 19
Social Media 1
Tweets 1
Citations 5
Citation Indexes 5
Repository URL:
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/soe_research/1346
DOI:
10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.012
RePec URLs:
http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jeborg/v81y2012i1p29-38.html
Author(s):
GUHA, Brishti
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV; Elsevier
Tags:
Business, Management and Accounting; Economics, Econometrics and Finance; Pirates; Fishermen; Patrolling; Multiple equilibria; Policy responses; Pirates; Fishermen; Patrolling; Multiple equilibria; Policy responses;; Basic or Discovery Scholarship; Behavioral Economics; Applied Microeconomics
article description
Motivated by the Somali fishermen–pirates, I explore the time allocation decision of potential pirates between piracy and an alternative non-violent occupation, fishing, when the returns of both piracy and fishing are sensitive to patrolling intensity. For a range of parameters, the static model yields multiple equilibria, an “efficient” one with no patrolling and low piracy, a less efficient equilibrium with intermediate levels of both piracy and patrolling and a highly inefficient high-patrolling high-piracy equilibrium. Analyzing the dynamic analogue, I obtain the surprising result that sufficiently low patrolling can be a good strategy.