The principalship, autonomy, and after

Citation data:

Journal of Educational Administration and History, ISSN: 1478-7431, Vol: 47, Issue: 4, Page: 414-431

Publication Year:
Usage 235
Abstract Views 210
Link-outs 25
Captures 19
Readers 12
Exports-Saves 7
Social Media 4
Tweets 4
Citations 4
Citation Indexes 4
Repository URL:
Eacott, Scott
Informa UK Limited
Social Sciences; Educational Administration and Supervision
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
article description
Contemporary discourses in educational administration have exponentially grown the number of adjectival leaderships, challenged traditional organisational structures, and offered autonomy as a solution to performance issues. In this theoretical paper, I ask what does the principalship look like after autonomy? Despite the range of objections that could be raised in relation to thinking with and through an organisational role, it is the contention of this paper that it is in the principalship that we find important resources for theorising educational administration, even if, at first sight, these resources appear to bear little connection to, or resonance with, contemporary discourses of ‘leadership’ in education. Working within a relational approach to educational administration that I am advancing, my argument is built around three key markers: the centrality of temporality, the (im)possibility of the local, and the imposition of ‘quality’.