The Reliability of the Psychiatric Impairment Scale (PIRS) in Valuing Psychological Impairment

Citation data:

Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, ISSN: 1321-8719, Vol: 20, Issue: 5, Page: 700-704

Publication Year:
2013
Usage 199
Abstract Views 177
Full Text Views 16
Link-outs 6
Captures 7
Exports-Saves 7
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:
https://ro.uow.edu.au/smhpapers/1234
DOI:
10.1080/13218719.2012.729020
Author(s):
Gordon R.W. Davies
Publisher(s):
Informa UK Limited; Taylor & Francis Group
Tags:
Medicine; Psychology; Social Sciences; psychiatric; reliability; scale; pirs; impairment; valuing; psychological; Medicine and Health Sciences; Social and Behavioral Sciences
article description
This study examines the validity of valuations made using the descriptors in the subscales of the Psychiatric Impairment Scale (PIRS). Estimates of the item valuations on a 0-100 scale made by a group of psychiatrists trained in the use of the PIRS and a comparative group of patients with psychiatric disorders were compared. The results are contrasted with impairment ratings resulting from the use of the prescribed valuations of the descriptors. There was good agreement between the groups on the valuation of classes 1 and 2, but a substantial loss of discriminative ability for classes 3, 4 and 5. Valuations of the degree of disability for each class were, in all cases, much larger than the value obtained using the standard scoring system, suggesting that the level of impairment measured by the PIRS is undervalued. Questions are also raised regarding the reliability of the PIRS in use. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.