Perceived access to self-relevant information mediates judgments of privacy violations in neuromonitoring and other monitoring technologies

Citation data:

Neuroethics, ISSN: 1874-5504, Vol: 7, Issue: 1, Page: 43-50

Publication Year:
Usage 270
Abstract Views 248
Link-outs 22
Captures 35
Exports-Saves 21
Readers 14
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
Repository URL:;
Baker, Denise A.; Schweitzer, N. J.; Risko, Evan F.
Springer Nature; Springer Netherlands
Neuroscience; Medicine; Privacy; Self; Neuroethics; Self-identity; Neuromonitoring; Privacy; Self; Neuroethics; Self-identity; Neuromonitoring; Psychology
article description
Advances in technology are bringing greater insight into the mind, raising a host of privacy concerns. However, the basic psychological mechanisms underlying the perception of privacy violations are poorly understood. Here, we explore the relation between the perception of privacy violations and access to information related to one's "self." In two studies using demographically diverse samples, we find that privacy violations resulting from various monitoring technologies are mediated by the extent to which the monitoring is thought to provide access to self-relevant information, and generally neuromonitoring did not rate among the more invasive monitoring types. However, brain monitoring was judged to be more of a privacy violation when described as providing access to self-relevant information than when no such access was possible, and control participants did not judge the invasiveness of neuromonitoring any differently than those told it provided no access to self-relevant information. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media.