Bayesian mixed models and the phylogeny of pitvipers (Viperidae: Serpentes).

Citation data:

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, ISSN: 1055-7903, Vol: 39, Issue: 1, Page: 91-110

Publication Year:
2006
Usage 33
Abstract Views 28
Link-outs 5
Captures 260
Readers 257
Exports-Saves 3
Citations 167
Citation Indexes 167
Repository URL:
http://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib/8271; http://stars.library.ucf.edu/facultybib2000/6006; https://uta.influuent.utsystem.edu/en/publications/record%282c4c5f15-e0f9-4590-93d6-76ee5be1a92f%29.html
PMID:
16504544
DOI:
10.1016/j.ympev.2005.12.014
Author(s):
Castoe, Todd A; Parkinson, Christopher L
Publisher(s):
Elsevier BV
Tags:
Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Bayesian phylogeny; Crotalinae; data partitions; MCMC; mixed models; pitvipers; posterior probability credibility; viperidael; CHAIN MONTE-CARLO; RIBOSOMAL DNA-SEQUENCES; MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA; MOLECULAR; SYSTEMATICS; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; DATA SETS; COMPLEX; TRIMERESURUS; BOOTSTRAP; INFERENCE; Biochemistry & Molecular Biology; Evolutionary Biology; Genetics &; Heredity; Bayesian phylogeny; Crotalinae; Data partitions; MCMC; Mixed models; Pitvipers; Posterior probability credibility; Viperidae
article description
The subfamily Crotalinae (pitvipers) contains over 190 species of venomous snakes distributed in both the Old and New World. We incorporated an extensive sampling of taxa (including 28 of 29 genera), and sequences of four mitochondrial gene fragments (2.3kb) per individual, to estimate the phylogeny of pitvipers based on maximum parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic methods. Our Bayesian analyses incorporated complex mixed models of nucleotide evolution that allocated independent models to various partitions of the dataset within combined analyses. We compared results of unpartitioned versus partitioned Bayesian analyses to investigate how much unpartitioned (versus partitioned) models were forced to compromise estimates of model parameters, and whether complex models substantially alter phylogenetic conclusions to the extent that they appear to extract more phylogenetic signal than simple models. Our results indicate that complex models do extract more phylogenetic signal from the data. We also address how differences in phylogenetic results (e.g., bipartition posterior probabilities) obtained from simple versus complex models may be interpreted in terms of relative credibility. Our estimates of pitviper phylogeny suggest that nearly all recently proposed generic reallocations appear valid, although certain Old and New World genera (Ovophis, Trimeresurus, and Bothrops) remain poly- or paraphyletic and require further taxonomic revision. While a majority of nodes were resolved, we could not confidently estimate the basal relationships among New World genera and which lineage of Old World species is most closely related to this New World group.