IUCD Insertion and Fixation versus Insertion Only During Cesarean Section
Al-Azhar International Medical Journal, Vol: 3, Issue: 1, Page: 30-35
2022
- 155Usage
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage155
- Downloads137
- Abstract Views18
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
Background; Women who have a caesarean section (CS) are in a unique position to receive the IUD (IUD). Aim and objectives; to assess the efficacy, safety, convenience and complications of copper IUCD inserted immediately after expulsion of the placenta during lower segment caesarian section and comparison of the results according if the IUCD is fixed or not. This is carried out by clinical assessment and follow- up by ultrasound. Subjects and methods; This is Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, was carried out at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sohag General Hospital (Sohag, Egypt), on 200 pregnant women, during twelve months (December 1st, 2019 – November 30 th , 2020). Result; there was statistically significant increase expulsion in insertion of IUD without stitch. Conclusion; IUCD insertion and fixation with absorbable suture (fixation group) was the best healthy results at all study points and the less expulsion rate than IUCD insertion only without fixation (no-fixation group).
Bibliographic Details
Al-Azhar University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know