An Endoscopic Journey to the Center of the Skull Base for Novice Neurosurgeons: From Cadaver to Theater
Al-Azhar International Medical Journal, Vol: 4, Issue: 8
2023
- 139Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage139
- Downloads81
- Abstract Views58
Article Description
Background: For novice neurosurgeons (nNS), it is important to determine the safety of extended-endoscopic endonasal approaches (eEEA) by analyzing/eliminating surgical drawbacks. Aim: To evaluate the impact of cadaveric training for nNS on reducing obstacles/complication rates in the operative theater.Subjects and Methods: This unique study has two parts: first; the lab/cadaveric part included a checklist scoring system to estimate the ability of nNS to dissect/identify basic and complex anatomical landmarks (BCAL) (n=50) via eEEA for the center of the skull base (CSB) using 2 formalin-fixed heads and a dry skull for tumor simulation. Second; theater/clinical part included 28 cases with sellar/suprasellar lesions.Results: In the lab, nNS could identify 60% (n=30) of all BCAL throughout their 50-hour hands-on intensive cadaveric training. They were able to identify 66.7% (n=10), 100% (n=13) and 31.8% (n=7) of pertinent nasal, sphenoidal and sellar/CSB landmarks, respectively. In theater, following cadaveric training, ergonomics were satisfactory without major complications. Nevertheless, the most frequent intraoperative obstacle for nNS was the loss of dynamic endoscopy/scissoring of instruments (17.8%) with occasional false trajectories or inadequate exposure of the landmarks (7%). We included pituitary adenomas (53.6%), tuberculum sellae meningiomas(7%), Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs) (18%), clival chordoma (3.6%), hypothalamic hamartoma (3.6%) and craniopharyngiomas(limited to the infra chiasmatic cistern without serious calcification) (14.2%). Gross total resection was achieved at (86%). A favourable outcome was achieved in 86%. Conclusion: Cadaveric training for nNS improves the quality of basic endoscopic CSB procedures, avoids hazardous maneuvers and reduces complication rate in theater.
Bibliographic Details
Al-Azhar University
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know