The Roles and Practices of Business Analysts: A Boundary Practice Perspective
2010
- 2,752Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2,752
- Downloads1,433
- 1,433
- Abstract Views1,319
- 1,319
Conference Paper Description
To develop a better understanding of the practice of business and systems analysis, we adopted the boundary practice lens to view business analysis as a boundary practice between users and IT staff. This paper presents findings from an interpretive case study of a group of business analysts working within a large public sector university. We find that business analysts are largely expected to ‘protect’ the users and IT staff from each other. The business analysts’ location in the organisation structure and previous work experience in business or IT is likely to influence (a) the focus of their work (b) the closeness and trust developed with users and IT staff and (c) their legitimacy in spanning users and IT staff. To be able to bring about agreed requirements specifications that are both technically possible to realise and can be delivered at an acceptable cost, but also will result in a system that is suitable for the business purpose and easy to use, business analysts need to negotiate a middle path between users and IT staff. Because business analysts need to work effectively with IT and the business and move easily between the respective cultures, learning outcomes in the education of BAs need to emphasise (a) dealing with social and political context of both business requirements and technical/economic feasibility and (b) using distinct skills, knowledge, tools, and techniques in dealing with users and IT.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know