The Development of a Hedonic Price Index for Personal Computers with Applications to Information Technology Productivity Research
1998
- 172Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage172
- Downloads132
- Abstract Views40
Article Description
Recent work, using the firm as the level of analysis, has applied econometric methods to assess the payoff to spending on information technology ( Berndt and Morrison, 1995; Brynjolfsson and Hitt, 1993, 1995, 1996; Lehr and Lichtenberg, 1997; Lichtenberg, 1995; Loveman, 1994; Morrison and Berndt, 1991; Sabyasachi and Chaya, 1996; Weill, 1990; Weill, 1992). One component to performing such an analysis is the application of an appropriate price index that accounts for quality change over time in the inputs to production, in this case, information technology. Currently, there are no valid price indexes for IT. The often-cited works of Brynjolfsson and Hitt were forced to rely on a price index ( Gordon, 1990) that was both out-of-date (ending four years before their data begins) and developed for a different type of computer (mainframe), because this index was the best available. Despite the increasing importance of microcomputers to business, an appropriately specified price index covering the microcomputer has yet to be developed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know