Metaknowledge Management in Inquiring Organizations: Towards a Knowledge Ecology
2000
- 246Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage246
- Downloads128
- Abstract Views118
Article Description
Metaknowledge management is the judicious or strategic management or leveraging of the different ways in which we come “to know,” based on Churchman’s (1971) classic work, “The Design of Inquiring Systems” so that we respond to situations in the most appropriate way. It differs from knowledge management in that it is concerned more with how we know what we know than with what we know per se (information and knowledge). By helping individuals and organizations to understand and be aware of their preferred ways of thinking and knowing, in terms of Churchman’s inquiring systems, organizations can leverage their knowledge assets and collective wisdom to increase innovation and responsiveness. This workshop builds on, and provides a means to integrate, the Churchmanian based works of Courtney, Croasdell and Paradise’s (1998) work on Inquiring Organizations, Harrison and Bramson’s (1982) Inquiry Modes, Malhotra’s ( 1997, 1998) work on Knowledge Management in Inquiring Organizations and Knowledge Ecology, and Mitroff and Linstone’s (1993) work on New Thinking for the Information Age and Unbounded Systems Thinking. Such a synthesis can provide a practical and applied approach to the development of a knowledge ecology conducive to the generation and utilization of actionable knowledge at the individual, group, and organizational/community levels.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know