Utilizando el Modelo de Calidad de McCall y el Estándar ISO-9126 para la Evaluación de la Calidad de Sistemas de Información por los Usuarios
2010
- 5,674Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage5,674
- Abstract Views2,884
- 2,884
- Downloads2,790
- 2,790
Article Description
Los sistemas de información son una herramienta fundamental en la operación diaria de las organizaciones. El software es una objeto totalmente abstracto del cual los usuarios solo perciben su efecto, más no pueden conocer la construcción del mismo. Además, tradicionalmente los usuarios participan solo en etapas iniciales o al final de la construcción de un nuevo sistema. Esta investigación involucró a los usuarios en la evaluación de la calidad de software a través de un caso de estudio donde participaron dos grupos de usuarios diferentes evaluando 2 prototipos del mismo sistema. Se evaluaron mediante cuestionarios construidos basados en el modelo de calidad de McCall (1977) combinado con un estándar (ISO/IEC_9126-1, 2001). Los resultados indican que la participación de los usuarios en la evaluación de la calidad realmente impactan la calidad.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know