Deploying Design Science Research in Graduate Computing Studies in South Africa
2015
- 251Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage251
- Abstract Views174
- Downloads77
Article Description
Design Science Research is a relatively recent paradigm, which has enjoyed more acceptance Design science research is a relatively recent paradigm, which has enjoyed more acceptance In information systems than in computer science. Yet researchers are increasingly accepting this new paradigm where artifacts are to be developed to solve a problem, and the knowledge that is derived during the process is recorded and contributes to the field of knowledge. It is also particularly applicable in a developing world context. In this paper we present two case studies, demonstrating how two postgraduate students used design science research during their research. We reflect on the lessons learned and explain how design science research can be an attractive option for graduate student research at masters and doctoral level in both Information Systems and Computer Science.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know