An Empirical Investigation of Sustainability Innovation Systems and the Stages of Sustainability Maturity
2017
- 643Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage643
- Abstract Views560
- Downloads83
Artifact Description
Sustainability innovation systems refer to the strategic investment in IT assets to enable business sustainability within each stage of sustainability maturity. This stages of sustainability maturity framework proposes that the role played by IT assets to support sustainability depends on the stage of sustainability maturity achieved. We set out to examine these propositions using data collected from the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reports of two high sustainability U.S. based firms in the pharmaceutical industry over a six-year period from 2009 to 2015. Our research has provided some empirical support for the proposition that companies follow a staged path to sustainability maturity and their investments in IT assets reflect their maturity stage. Importantly, our research shows that GRI reports are a reliable secondary data source for scholars and practitioners who want to conduct longitudinal empirical studies on sustainability information systems.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know