How Information Management and Integration Influence Strategic Performance
2017
- 163Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage163
- Abstract Views107
- Downloads56
Artifact Description
This work aims to analyze the influence of integration and information management capabilities on strategic business performance from a qualitative point of view.Thus, this paper presents the results of a multiple case study in three market-leaders organizations in their segment in the country (a bank, a retailer, and a manufacturer). The research model based on dynamic capabilities proposes that other organizational capabilities can measure these influences (flexibility, reconfiguration, and agility). The results of content analysis of interviews with fifteen organization's executives point to a series of connections between the two capabilities and dimensions identified in the literature. The influence observed can go through different ways to confer greater competitiveness to organizations, but there is a more consistent way with greater intensity that has been verified among the cases.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know