The Business Value of Engaging in Counter-Breach Initiatives
2018
- 235Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage235
- Abstract Views175
- Downloads60
Artifact Description
Facing an increasing information security threat, companies react by engaging in various counter-breach initiatives. The business value of such initiatives is under-studied. This paper utilizes an organizational legitimacy view, overlaid by behavioral theory of the firm (BTOF), to examine whether counter-breach initiatives are rewarded by the market, and whether the magnitude of such rewards depends on the institutional environment. Based on a dataset of 3,212 observations from 2005 to 2015, and focusing on counter-breach initiatives that are revealed in public announcements and/or emphasized in annual reports, the results unfold an overall significant positive effect of counter-breach initiatives on Tobin’s q and future return on assets. The findings reveal that this effect is more pronounced for breached firms in low-risk industries and un-breached firms in high-risk industries. This paper contributes to the information security literature by showing the positivity, as well as institutional heterogeneity, of the business value of counter-breach initiatives. \ \ Keywords: Information security; counter-breach initiative; annual report; public announcement; Tobin's q
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know