Talk your way to serial success: Creator post-campaign interaction in crowdfunding
2018
- 195Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage195
- Abstract Views115
- Downloads80
Artifact Description
Online crowdfunding, an information technology (IT) mediated form of fundraising has continued to receive widespread attention from both the academic circle and industry practitioners. While most studies on crowdfunding have taken a one-shot look at the determinants of fundraising performance, limited attention has been paid to the value of creator post-campaign interactions with backers and how it may affect the performance of later crowdfunding campaigns. In this study, we argue and show that creators benefit from interacting with backers after a successful fundraising campaign as it positively affects the outcome of their later crowdfunding campaign. Also, the impact of the post-campaign interactions is more valuable to creators who may have experienced delays or failed in delivering on their previous crowdfunding campaign’s promises.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know