Rejoinder to Comments on Recent Developments in PLS
Communications of the Association for Information Systems, ISSN: 1529-3181, Vol: 52, Issue: 1, Page: 760-776
2023
- 4Citations
- 271Usage
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- Usage271
- Abstract Views184
- Downloads87
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
When we were first invited to write an essay on the use of PLS for CAIS, we wanted to focus on recent developments to help applied IS researchers, and the cAIS community of authors, reviewers, and editors make use of the latest research on and methodological advances in PLS. Recognizing that Information Systems is arguably the discipline in which the use of PLS as an alternative to CB-SEM originated and is most widely used, we realized that, pragmatically, our essay must focus on how to use PLS, not whether to use PLS. We received six interesting responses from researchers active in the PLS community. Their thoughts on our presentation of recent developments in PLS show very different perspectives with many points of difference amongst points of agreement in all the responses. In this rejoinder, we briefly respond to the received comments, clarify our position and ideas, and identify points of agreement (and disagreement). We emphasize that none of the responses give us cause to revise or eliminate our recommendations in recent developments. Overall, we believe this discussion on PLS to be valuable in advancing the use of PLS in Information Systems, which is, as we show in this rejoinder, an urgent issue.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165432095&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05236; https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/cview.cgi/cais/vol52/iss1/51; https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol52/iss1/51; https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4497&context=cais; https://dx.doi.org/10.17705/1cais.05236; https://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/login.cgi?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Faisel.aisnet.org%2Fcgi%2Fcview.cgi%2Fcais%2Fvol52%2Fiss1%2F51&context=https://aisel.aisnet.org
Association for Information Systems
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know