There is something about process standards: An empirical analysis
2009
- 291Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage291
- Downloads163
- Abstract Views128
Conference Paper Description
Insights from qualitative information systems research reveal a strong impact of process standardization on the overall process performance like reduced process time or process costs in staff recruitment. Surprisingly, the process owners indicated that an increased use of information systems (IS) in different sub processes such as candidate attraction or applicant tracking triggered overall process standardization. Based on these qualitative research approaches and the additional literature about the antecedents of process standardization and its impact we conducted an empirical survey with 156 process owners in large scale companies to revise these findings. The evaluation of our structural equation model using partial least squares shows that process standardization is a full mediator for the relationship between system usage and process performance measured in process time, cost, and quality and that information systems usage directly and significantly influences process standardization.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know