23P. Dialogue Model for Media:
2010
- 158Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage158
- Downloads114
- Abstract Views44
Conference Paper Description
Computer-mediated communication research focuses on media richness and naturalness in communication tools and their correlation for communication effectiveness. The underlying idea is that the more similar the medium is to face-to-face communication, the richer it is. The more equivocal a task in the organization is, the richer medium is required for communication. This approach has two problems. First, it focuses on the richness of the medium used not the process of communicating. Second, as for the medium, it is the support for richness that is expected, not their support for the process of communication. This paper presents a tentative Dialogue Model for Media that aims to support the communication process. The model is based on central elements that are required to support the communication process.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know