Revealing knowledge networks from computer mediated communication in organizations
2009
- 155Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage155
- Downloads109
- Abstract Views46
Article Description
Managers continually invest in new information technology (IT) but the question of organizationalvalue still seems vague. One explanation is poor evaluation. In practice the Business Case includingReturn on Investment (ROI) still dominate. Information System research has noted for a long time thatthe Economic Approach is not sufficient and instead the Interpretative IT Evaluation Approach hasbeen put forward. However, the approach has reached limited acceptance in practice and it has beennoted that what to evaluate is a far more complex process than might first appear. The aim of thisstudy is to articulate factors and criteria that are important to consider when assessing theorganizational value of IT investments. This study is part of a Collaborative Practice Research projectthat took place 2005-2008 at three public organizations. The findings indicate that it is time to take astep from a Business Case to a Value Case. The Value Case is a pluralistic, a formative and aformalized approach that includes factors and criteria that have its base in prior research and havebeen further discussed and analyzed by the respondents. The Value Case also put management’sattention to effectiveness and efficiency, the task of management.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know