DESIGNING USER-ADAPTIVE INFORMATION DASHBOARDS: CONSIDERING LIMITED ATTENTION AND WORKING MEMORY
2019
- 535Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage535
- Abstract Views329
- Downloads206
Conference Paper Description
Business intelligence systems provide information dashboards that aim to assist decision-makers in understanding business situations and consequently support in decision making. They typically include compressed visual information to raise data exploration from different perspectives. Although information visualization is known as a possible solution to overcome human cognitive limitations such as attention and working memory, we do not know much about existing cognitive challenges of users when performing data exploration tasks using information dashboards. In this paper, we present the results of an eye-tracking experiment to study the impact of attention and working memory limitations on the effectiveness of dashboards. For that, we explicitly considered visuospatial working memory capacity (WMC) as one critical individual difference and investigated how users with different visuospatial WMC allocate attentional resources while conducting data exploration task. We found that both users with high and low visuospatial WMC have difficulties to control their attentional resources. However, these difficulties are more for users with low visuospatial WMC in compare with high WMC. Our results highlighted the need for designing user-adaptive information dashboards. Therefore, we articulated meta-requirements for designing information dashboards that are sensitive to the attention and WMC of their users as two central components of information processing theory.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know