AR-Based Learning in Vocational Training — Evaluation of Learning Outcome Comparing Augmented Reality and Teacher-Instructed Learning Units
2024
- 170Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage170
- Abstract Views132
- Downloads38
Artifact Description
Augmented reality (AR) is gaining popularity as a tool for vocational training scenarios. However, quantitative research results regarding learning outcome of augmented reality applications in vocational training environments are scarce. In this paper, we present the results of an experiment conducted at a vocational school in Germany, where we compared the learning outcome of 52 students who used AR glasses to those who were instructed by a teacher. The selected learning unit is well-proven and part of the curriculum of the selected school. It includes the introduction and operation of a milling machine for woodworking. The paper describes difficulties encountered in the conducted empirical study when developing and using the AR- based learning unit. In an empirical evaluation the learners with AR glasses achieved the same learning outcome as learners in the conventional learning unit with the teacher.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know