Assessment of Knowledge Management’s Growth in South Africa
2008
- 282Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage282
- Downloads144
- Abstract Views138
Conference Paper Description
This article revisits a debate surrounding Knowledge Management (KM) to report on an empirical study conducted in 86 South African based organizations, specifically regarding growth in KM maturity over a five year period. The findings indicate that KM is fairly well institutionalized in South African industry, with most organizations indicating that significant growth occurred in KM over the past five years. Analysis of the growth in KM maturity, as it relates to different organizational sizes, reveals that there are statistical differences between the score reported by Small, Medium, Large and Extra-Large organizations. Similarly, scores reported by Senior, Middle and Operational personnel differ primarily between the scores decided upon by Operational personnel and Senior managers. Viewed holistically, findings suggest that there could be a “break-even point” between resources available and KM growth with Extra-Large organizations given their advantage in KM growth. Findings also indicated that growth in KM differs between industry groupings, with Construction, Building Materials and Mining companies achieving high growth (+/- 70%), Consumer Goods and Utilities (+/- 60%), Banks and Insurance, Automotive and Transport, Government and ICT companies, moderate growth (+/- 50%), and Educational institutions, low growth (+/- 40%).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know