Towards Efficient Information Sharing in Network Markets
2024
- 70Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage70
- Downloads65
- Abstract Views5
Artifact Description
This paper develops a Salop differentiation model to study private and social incentives to share information within a platform ecosystem, between a platform intermediary and its business users. Information sharing can help business users to make more efficient decisions around their market and product innovation strategies improving social welfare. However, private and social incentives for information sharing do not coincide when the platform intermediary is vertically integrated and competes directly with its business users in the upstream market of the platform market. So, there is a scope for an \emph{ex-ante} regulation of mandatory data sharing. We argue that the location of data access matters and propose a regulatory framework that introduces a new data right for platform users, the \emph{in-situ} data right, which is associated with positive welfare gains. By construction, this right enables effective information sharing, together with its context, without reducing the value created by network effects. We discuss crucial elements of its implementation in order to achieve innovation-friendly and competitive digital markets.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know