Market Penetration of Office Automation Equipment; Trends and Forecasts
1985
- 338Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage338
- Downloads251
- Abstract Views87
Article Description
This article identifies the major factors that are influencing the rate of market penetration of office automation equipment, presents trend data on national and industry investment in office automation and other equipment, extrapolates these trends to 1995, and compares several recent penetration forecasts against the trend data. The data show that office-intensive industries such as finance are rapidly increasing their capital/labor ratios, and that office automation equipment represents a significant portion of this total investment (about 40%). The relative importance of equipment costs in determining the penetration rate is likely to decline as training and implementation costs increase and become more visible, and as more managerial and professional tasks become automated. Investment trends offer a useful basis from which to analyze and assess market penetration forecasts. The plausibility of forecasts can be judged by comparing them against extrapolations of past investment behavior, particularly the ratio of investment in equipment of all kinds to industry product or GNP. A forecast that appears plausible on these grounds must be examined further to determine whether it accounts for the effects of other costs that are more difficult to measure, and for less quantifiable factors that, overall, could play a dominant role in shaping market penetration patterns and rates.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know