Institutional Influences in Individual-level Innovation Adoption outside Organizational Contexts: A Scale Development Study
2012
- 458Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage458
- Abstract Views349
- Downloads109
Article Description
There has recently been a growing interest in IS innovation research regarding how institutional influences affect organizations’ adoption decisions under the label “organizational institutionalism”. However, there has been a lack of research regarding institutional influences on individual adopters in non-organizational adoption settings, although insitutional theory's foundations apply to decisions made by actors in general. In our paper, we expand the use of institutional theory to also include the impact on individuals in non-organizational settings. We develop three constructs comprising “institutional influences on individual-level innovation adoption”- normative, cultural-cognitive, and regulative influences - in a non-organizational setting, and rigorously validate them through a state-of-the-art procedure. Subsequently, we empirically test the measurement model’s fit and the constructs’ validity and reliability through a web-based survey. Besides, we find that institutional individual-level influences' impact on behavioral intention is mediated through performance expectations, which is in contrast to their direct impact on intention in organizational settings.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know