Cornerstone of terror: the double-edged impact of fear appeals in a transformational information system security project
2014
- 238Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage238
- Abstract Views167
- Downloads71
Article Description
Researchers in Information Systems Security (ISS) have recommended the use of fear appeals in order to foster user adoption. However, research in the fields of ethics, management and consumer sales confirm that not only is the use of coercive methods less efficient but it can also cause resistance phenomena. The purpose of our research was to determine whether legitimacy be established through a sense-making process based upon fear appeals. We conducted a case study within a leading international group in the field of telecommunications. We investigated how the management team uses fear appeals to legitimize a large and transformational Information Systems Security project. Our exploratory study suggests that the implementation of fear appeals is more complex than literature suggests and shows that it has a double-edged impact.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know