The Impact of Networks of Public on Crowdsourcing in the UK Heritage Sector
2016
- 241Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage241
- Abstract Views175
- Downloads66
Artifact Description
This research explores the interaction between internal heritage personnel and the public over social media. Focusing on the phenomena of crowdsourcing and what it means to the individuals involved with it, the study employs a qualitative, interpretive approach, focusing on contemporary history ('living memory') interactions between participants of three UK Armed Forces museums and the public. Using the conceptual framework of networks of practice as a sensitizing concept in order to gain insight into how museum personnel employ, instigate and respond to the activity of crowdsourcing, participant interviews were analyzed using Grounded Theory Methodology. The findings challenge contentions in literature on the formation of, and knowledge exchange in, networks of practice suggesting that rather than extending existing understanding of such networks, a new form of electronic network has emerged around the museum context: the network of public.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know