Selecting a Software Tool for ITIL using a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
2018
- 496Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage496
- Abstract Views284
- Downloads212
Artifact Description
The opportunity to improve service quality using ITIL has led many organizations to invest in the implementation of this framework. Selecting a software tool for ITIL is still one of the most difficult decisions due to lack of meaningful evaluation criteria and guidelines to help on that decision, making this, one of the most important and error-triggering steps in this way. A multi-criteria value model to evaluate software tools for ITIL using a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach based on MACBETH is then proposed to address this problem. A focus on the functionality of the tool to extract criteria from the literature to assess four representative software solutions for ITIL in the market is made along with its demonstration in a company of the bank sector. Finally, using Moody and Shanks Framework, the proposed method is evaluated showing that is suitable for evaluating software tools for ITIL.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know