Disaster Recovery – The Process Management Perspective
2012
- 445Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage445
- Abstract Views256
- Downloads189
Article Description
Process management is becoming increasingly important for managing commercial, governmental as well as non-profit (NGOs) organisations. Process management approaches depend on the process characteristics and requirements, typically determined by the organisational context, both internal and external. Managing processes crossing the NGOs, Government and business agencies brings upon brand new challenges. Our research focuses on disaster recovery, as a prime example of such a complex cross-organisational environment. Eventhough every disaster is unique, when considered from the process perspective, disaster recovery could be seen as a set of operational processes – some of which are highly structured and predefined, while the others are highly emergent, ad-hoc processes that need to be designed in-situ and managed asthey evolve. Through an in-depth review of the relevant literature published by the Business Process Management (BPM) and disaster recovery (DR) research communities this paper reports on the existing research on the process management perspective of disaster recovery. The literature was analysed through a theoretical lens combining two existing frameworks previously developed for a formal organisational context. Our research provides insights into the main characteristics of the operational processes and suggests that their management should consider the so-called “Integration Model” and “Collaboration model” as the most suitable.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know