Centrality or De-Centrality? Hidden Influences for Sustaining Online Communities
2020
- 182Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage182
- Abstract Views130
- Downloads52
Article Description
Online communities (OCs) have the potential to provide great benefits to society, but few have been successful in sustaining user participation. Although this subject has been studied from multiple angles, an under-explored topic is how an individual influences others to continue participation. This study adopts the theoretical concept of networked individualism to investigate a sustained OC, and employs a qualitative approach to social network analysis. We find that (1) a conversation “outsider” can be a specific knowledge “insider,” and (2) communication chit-chats can be important for strengthening networks. The findings reveal that an individual’s influence in an OC cannot be defined solely by the level of participation or the degree of involvement. Even if the presence of outsiders and chit-chats is minimal, participants perceive their value as both worthwhile and impactful. Communicators and discussion subjects in peripheral positions within communication networks can embody hidden influences that help sustain an OC.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know