From Twitter to COVID-19: Using NLP to Predict COVID-19 Infections
2021
- 392Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage392
- Abstract Views359
- Downloads32
- Plays1
Article Description
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic creates tremendous negative impacts on our health systems, businesses, and society. Therefore, monitoring the spread of the ongoing pandemic is an essential but challenging task. In this work, we first describe an annotated COVID-19 Twitter dataset that we provide to the research community to tackle this task. It allows identifying actual and potential COVID-19 patients as well as groups of potential COVID-19 positive contacts using social network sites. Second, we show that it is possible to detect COVID-positive users on the Twitter platform and estimate the officially reported COVID-19 infections in the U.S. per state by leveraging state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Moreover, our results reveal a high spatial and temporal correlation with the reported data, indicating a good fit for estimating the cumulated and time series' trend and a promising foundation for decision support and monitoring the pandemic.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know