DEVELOPONG DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES TO INCREASE CYBERSECURITY POLICYMAKING AGILITY AND RESILIENCE
2024
- 181Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage181
- Abstract Views103
- Downloads78
Artifact Description
Organizations need to keep pace with the ever-changing dynamics of their cyber environments. A crucial facet of this adaptability involves embracing agility in cybersecurity policymaking (CSPM). Yet, the existing body of literature in this domain remains understudied, and this short paper strives to address this gap by investigating the notion of agility in CSPM and identifying its Dynamic Capabilities (DCs). The findings from the first two phases of the study have revealed a set of six DCs. We have hypothesized that configurations of these DCs can lead to CSPM agility and cyber resilience. Thus, this paper presents preliminary findings and sets out the use of fuzzy set quantitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) method to find the combinations of the DCs that result in CSPM agility and cyber resilience. Our findings have implications for the Information Systems discourse as they enhance our understanding of how DCs enable agility and resilience in CSPM.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know