Understanding Two-Stage Balance of Competitive Bidding in Crowdsourcing: A Response Surface Analysis
2025
- 40Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage40
- Abstract Views25
- Downloads15
Article Description
The rapid growth of crowdsourcing platforms grants unprecedented opportunities to clients to procure services digitally. Clients typically solicit solutions via competitive bidding, wherein they outline their requirements in task descriptions, and bidders respond with bidding proposals. Yet, prior research has not achieved consensus on how characteristics of task descriptions impact bidding outcomes with scholarly debates persisting with regard to whether conformity or serendipity of proposals is determinative in competitive bidding. To bridge these knowledge gaps, we advance a research model aimed at disentangling the two-stage balance of competitive bidding in crowdsourcing context. Analytical results attest to a positive effect of the incongruence of task description characteristics on conformity and serendipity of candidate solutions, with task appeal and client reputation serving as moderators. Implications for theory and practice based on the empirical findings were discussed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know