The relationship of earnings management with ownership concentration and board structure: A study of publicly-listed firms for the years 2002-2007
2009
- 5Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage5
- Abstract Views5
Thesis / Dissertation Description
We investigate the effect of internal corporate governance mechanisms, such as ownership concentration and board structure, on earnings management on non-financial publicly-listed firms, for the years 2001-2007. We find evidence that ownership concentration as measured by largest share holding, and by an ownership concentration dummy, decreases earnings management, which may mean that there is efficiency in the management of a company given a large ownership concentration. Moreover, we find evidence that a larger board structure decreases earnings management because of the expertise a larger board can bring. However, a greater ratio of independent directors also decreases earnings management, because independent directors act in the interest of stockholders. Overall, we conclude that despite the negative effect of internal corporate governance mechanisms on earnings management, there is still room for improvement in the implementation of certain regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, since we find that some firms do not comply with all the regulations in the Corporate Governance Code.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know