Perceptions of accountancy students and faculty of De La Salle University on academic dishonesty using the business fraud triangle model
2015
- 129Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage129
- Abstract Views129
Thesis / Dissertation Description
This study aims to determine whether significant differences exist between the perceptions of students and faculty on academic dishonesty with regard to the elements of the business fraud triangle model. In line with this, the two populations were asked to complete a survey, and the mean scores for the statements under each element of the fraud triangle were compared. T2-test revealed that the two populations had a significant difference in their perceptions when it comes to the incentive, opportunity, and rationalization element of the fraud triangle. Moreover, the study also examined whether significant differences in perceptions also exist within certain demographic profiles in each of the two populations. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and T2-tests showed that the cumulative grade point average (CGPA), year level, and number of accounting subjects retaken caused significant differences in the perceptions within the population of students. As for the faculty, MANOVA and T2-tests showed that the age and the degree earned did not cause a significant difference in the perceptions of faculty, while MANOVA showed that the number of years spent in the academe caused a significant difference in their perceptions.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know