Optical character recognizer using artificial neural networks
1995
- 13Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage13
- Abstract Views13
Thesis / Dissertation Description
Artificial Neural Net Models have been studied for many years in hope of achieving human-like performance in the fields of speech and image recognition. These models are composed of many non-linear computational elements operating in parallel and arranged in patterns reminiscent of biological neural nets. Computational elements or nodes are connected via weights that are typically adapted during use to improve performance. There has been a recent resurgence in the field of artificial neural nets caused by new topologies and algorithms, analog VLSI implementation techniques, and belief that massive parallelism is essential for high performance speech and image recognition. The pattern classification abilities of neural networks have make them suitable for practical image recognition tasks such as industrial character recognition. This paper provides the application of two important neural net models to recognition of IC characters. The aim is to ascertain the network sizes that are suitable for both rotated and unrotated characters, and the performance of these networks with untrained font types. A single method for pre-processing and representing character data was used for all networks. To limit training time, characters are considered of digits only.A significant feature in all the training sessions was the exclusion of actual IC character images in the training sets. This was to support the objective of determining the extent of font type invariance of Back Propagation (BPN) and Self-Organizing Map (SOM) networks. Lastly, it is emphasized that the results of the investigation are conclusive within the parameters of this investigation.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know