The Holy Family Academy High School outreach program 1987-1992: an evaluation
1994
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
Artifact Description
This research study evaluated the effectiveness of the High School Outreach Program of Holy Family Academy, Angeles City, Pampanga, from 1987 to 1992.The researcher followed Stufflebeam's model of evaluation. The Outreach Program was viewed as one system and was evaluated in four components: context, input, process, and product (output). The descriptive-evaluative method was used. The respondents were taken from the school community and the beneficiaries of the Outreach Program. There were 18 staff members (100 percent of total number) 44 faculty members (69.84 percent of total) 610 students (44.75 percent of total) and 50 beneficiaries (62.57 percent of total).Data were gathered through survey questionnaires, analysis of documents, ocular surveys of the areas, and unstructured interviews. Data were analyzed statistically using frequency, percentages, and mean scores. The findings in this study revealed that the High School Outreach Program has been effective however, there is a need to develop further the following areas of concern: spirituality, program involvement and commitment of the school community, and self-reliance on the part of the beneficiaries. The study further showed that financial and material needs of the beneficiaries were given more priority than the spiritual concerns.The researcher recommends that a follow-up or further study be done for more information on the effectiveness of the program. Other Benedictine schools with similar programs are encouraged to make an evaluation of their outreach program.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know