Coal bottom ash as partial replacement of fine aggregates in hollow load-bearing concrete masonry units
2003
- 86Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage86
- Abstract Views86
Artifact Description
The cost of basic construction materials such as cement, ordinary sand and gravel have steadily risen over the years and the production and sources of all these materials may not constitute a lifetime, therefore, industrialized countries have studied and introduced industrial waste as an alternative material for construction. By tapping this undesirable and unused industrial waste we can also solve one of the country's major problems related to environment and proper solid waste disposal. Coal bottom ash considered to be one of the industrial wastes, coming from coal-fired thermal power plants in the country was used as fine aggregates, an alternative material for ordinary sand in the manufacturing of hollow load-bearing concrete masonry units. This study shows comparative results in terms of performance through comprehensive strength test of concrete masonry units with sand as fine aggregates and concrete masonry units with coal bottom ash as partial replacement for sand. The study has developed the optimum mixed design of hollow load-bearing concrete masonry unit with coal bottom ash as partial replacement for sand in terms of the cement-aggregate ratio, water-cement ratio and the coal bottom ash-sand proportion. This developed mixed design which utilizes this industrial waste aims in solving the disposal problem, provide means of livelihood projects for the people in the area affected and helps in the preservation of our natural resources in the provinces affected by this industrial waste.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know