Evaluating e-government initiatives in MLGUs: The case of the municipality of Marilao, Bulacan
2013
- 61Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage61
- Abstract Views56
- Downloads5
Artifact Description
A daunting challenge for the Philippines is the current thrust to achieve its development agenda, wherein the drive towards good governance is viewed as one of the cornerstones for achieving inclusive growth. A central theme in this reform effort is ensuring equitable access to government services. Enshrined in the Local Government Code of 1991 (R.A. 7160) and the e-Commerce Act of 2000 (R.A. 8792), this brings forth new responsibilities resulting to the constant challenge of ensuring adherence to the tenets of good governance and societal inclusion. Parallel with this emphasis is the growing recognition of the importance of utilizing ICT to ensure access to government services. Thus the practice of e-Government is recognized as a venue to achieve its goals for bureaucratic reform. However, in spite of the potentials of e-Government, there are increasing concerns about the failure of numerous e-Government projects to achieve its desired goals. This concern is accompanied by a clamor to device an approach to assess-evaluate e-Government services. This paper will explore the applicability of identifying possible e-Government scorecard items and e-Government implementation roadmap for MLGUs. Subscribing to qualitative-descriptive research methodology through a deductive approach, the paper intends to identify the dominant factors that support and hinder e-Government initiatives in MLGUs.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know