Creating an environment conducive for high performance in SMART through improved project management initiatives
2015
- 13Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage13
- Abstract Views13
Artifact Description
Focusing on employee empowerment and organizational commitment, through leadership, results in attaining company goals and strategies. Given that companies are run by teams and its employees, it is important to keep in mind that investing and developing them must be in one of the company's best interests. Employees create products and services, but empowered and committed employees create quality products and services, in effect gaining competitive advantage. My action research about creating an environment conducive for high performance within Smart's IT-OSS Service Fulfillment/Provisioning team has proven to be effective to both the team and my company. After the completion of this action research, the objective of reducing escalations and complaints from different groups in the company was realized. Aside from achieving this objective, I also saw our team synergy improve which resulted to an improvement of overall team quality performance. The impact made was to implement changes within the team that focus on increasing staff participation in the delivery of projects. These changes were guided by both Ismail et al's (2011) Transformational Leadership-Empowerment-Organizational commitment (TEO) framework and Halm's (2011) Life Giving Workforce Design (LGWD) model. My action research has helped the company release and offer more quality products and services, thus resulting to an increase in customer satisfaction and loyalty. Moreover, I realized that working in an environment where everyone is empowered and committed is better and makes everyone's time in the office easier. As a result, everyone has seen their work done efficiently and effectively. I learned that change is inevitable in the workplace and essential, if it is warranted. Also, I should not let resistance to change get in the way and it should be properly managed to realize the full potential of the intended change.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know