Simulating the impact of kanbans in a multiple reentrant manufacturing system
2011
- 11Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage11
- Abstract Views10
- Downloads1
Artifact Description
A reentrant manufacturing system (RMS) is a system where this sequence of operations is repeated several times before the jobs are completed. This made the system difficult to manage as jobs entering a particular resource could be at different job states. Hence, in managing the WIP in the system, the decision is not only to determine which among the jobs queued to feed next as consideration of job states is also important. When these jobs are not prioritized appropriately, the system produces large amount of work-in-process (WIP) which leads to longer cycle time and poor throughput performance. This study aimed to explore the use of pull system through kanbans in managing of WIP and throughput of reentrant manufacturing systems and compared typical scheduling and control mechanisms that are associated to push and push-pull strategies. This study deals with a reentrant manufacturing system for a single class job which considers stochastic processing times. A simulation model was developed to examine the impact of kanban in the throughput and WIP performance of RMS. Comparing Kanban system to the traditional push and the push-pull strategies, the proposed system was able to show improvement in both throughput and WIP performance of an RMS. In determining the impact of the changes in kanban size to total WIP and throughput, this study has shown that generally increasing the number of kanbans does not necessarily translate to a better throughput. It is also important to consider the job state where the kanban should be allocated. This study highlights the importance of assigning bigger kanban size on the latter job state of the system and smaller at the newer state.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know