Keyword extraction for very high dimensional datasets using random projection as key input representation scheme
2011
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
Artifact Description
Keywords are increasingly useful as users are faced with the challenge of keeping up with voluminous information that they need to process every day. The most straightforward way for extracting keywords is to compute for the term frequencies for each document. But when dealing with corpora containing hundreds of thousands of unique terms, the huge amount of space needed and the enormous amount of computing time required to eventually extract the most relevant terms as keywords would severely limit the practical implementation of current keyword extraction techniques. As such, the frequency counts of extracted terms need to be subjected to a data compression scheme. In this research, the random projection method is used to compress the extracted data and the method allows for various clustering and keyword extraction algorithms to be done directly on the compressed data. Several experiments are conducted to assess the effect of the random projection method on the quality and time-space efficiency of the k-means clustering and term extraction.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know