Unveiling the facets of secrecy: A balance between trade secret protection and the public interest paradigm
2009
- 6Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage6
- Abstract Views6
Artifact Description
Despite being one of the intellectual property rights, the right to undisclosed information or trade secrets is not treated expressly in the Intellectual Property Code or some other comprehensive piece of legislation. The Philippine Supreme Court has however noted that the protection of trade secrets is evident in other laws. An evaluation of the current status of trade secret protection under the Philippine legal system yields to the conclusion that protection of trade secrets is not as absolute as commonly perceived.A public interest paradigm is herein formulated to highlight the prevailing view of the concept and serve as a model or framework against which the concept of trade secret protection may be considered. Clothing trade secrets with the character of a private proprietary right and recognition that it must be protected in the name of competition should not exclude consideration of its overall significance in the scheme of rights and duties. The proponent suggests that certain standards be considered in resolving the protection-disclosure conflict, particularly on the issue of health and/or environment.The evaluation of the current status of trade secret protection, the public interest paradigm, as well as a more appropriate definition of what constitutes a trade secret, form the basis of a Framework on Philippine Trade Secret Protection.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know