Try before you buy: Determining the mediating effects of an AR virtual try-on experience on the relationship between perceived personalization and co-creation intention moderated by perceived quality - The case of Sunnies Specs
2022
- 154Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage154
- Abstract Views138
- Downloads16
Thesis / Dissertation Description
As e-commerce gains traction, companies adapt through launching their own e-commerce platforms. However, compared to physical stores, there is less interactivity and engagements in e-commerce. Augmented Reality (AR) bridges this gap by providing users with a more personalized experience. With enhanced online shopping experiences made possible by personalization, the unique needs are considered by the company which encourages users to participate in value co-creation activities which increases customer loyalty and increased brand value. Value creation cannot be done by the company alone; the involvement of customers is equally important. Thus, this study examines the mediating effect of an AR digital experience on the relationship between perceived personalization and value co-creation intention and the moderating effect of perceived service quality on the said relationship. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed using data gathered from 400 survey respondents. Findings show that personalized services encourage users to co-create value by sharing their experiences or joining corporate activities. The relationship between perceived personalization and value co-creation is partially explained by trust which highlights the importance of building trust towards the use of AR. Lastly, perceived service quality strengthens the relationship between perceived personalization and value co-creation intention as mediated by perceived trust. Therefore, employing personalization strategies is recommended for users to participate in value co-creation activities. Future research may explore other factors that influence value co-creation intention in the Philippines.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know