Spectrogram analysis of electrocardiogram with normal sinus rhythm, arrhythmia and atrial fibrillation
2012
- 3Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage3
- Abstract Views3
Artifact Description
This paper intends to identify a method to distinguish between ECG signals from the Normal Sinus Rhythm (NSR) database and those from the Arrhythmia database. It also attempts to distinguish between NSR and Atrial Fibrillation (Afib). The ECG samples were taken from the database of MIT-BIH. For the first experiment, three-second segments of the entire ECG signals of NSR and that of the P wave alone were analyzed using their power spectral density (PSD). These were then compared to the ECG and P wave of those with Arrhythmia. Spectrum of the P wave clearly differentiates NSR and Arrhythmia. NSR signals exhibit a band within the 10 Hz region while ECG with arrhythmia has a frequency band less than 10 Hz. Furthermore, the dominant frequencies of the NSR extend up to 10 Hz while that of an arrhythmic ECG has very low dominant frequencies. For the second experiment, NSR and Afib signals were cut into 10-second segments. The Afib signals contain annotation marking episodes of normal rhythm and atrial fibrillation. NSR signals show significant frequency content up to more than 30 Hz while majority of the normal rhythm episodes from Afib had significant spectral content concentrated around 4 Hz with lower spectral density than that of NSR.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know