Corruption in North and South Korea: A comparative perspective
2001
- 19Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage19
- Abstract Views19
Article Description
This research involves a comparative analysis of the corruption phenomena in North and South Korea. Due to the distinction of structural characteristics of the society in North and South Korea, the causes of corruption for each country differ to a certain extent. In case of North Korea, the main cause of corruption can be viewed as the result of the distribution system of socialism, while in South Korea, the capitalistic development in the bureaucracy is one of the major roots of the cause. It is the author's view that the destructive power of corruption in North Korea is much stronger when compared to South Korea. Furthermore, the consequences of corruption in North Korea implicate a possible capitalistic development, while social conflict and distrust· between people and government are the likely effect of corruption in South Korea. This is illustrated by discussion of several corruption incidences that verify the corruption phenomena and its consequences to the society. Finally, since corruption phenomena is an obstacle for national development for both North and South Korea, the preventive strategies for corruption are suggested. In short, the author contends that as corruption hinders national development in both. North and South Korea, preventive anti-corruption strategies should be introduced to curb it.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know