Generative model based frame generation of volcanic flow video
HNICEM 2017 - 9th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management, Vol: 2018-January, Page: 1-5
2017
- 1Citations
- 2Usage
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Conference Paper Description
Automatic generation of computer graphics utilizing generative models has been the state of the art recently. The motivation of generating images on a natural phenomenon with a generative model is to simulate it more easily than with conventional methods, which usually propose some mathematical equations for simulation. In this paper, we focus on generating volcanic flow images by utilizing Deep Learning methods, such as Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks (DCGAN) and Variational Autoencoders (VAE). In order to simulate lava flow, we adopt videos that are uploaded YouTube as input dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that using DCGAN to our problem is inferior to utilizing VAE in terms of time complexity and quality of output images. These results suggest that when input dataset has categories that contain sequential images, it is more effective to utilize VAE rather than to use DCGAN.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047746649&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hnicem.2017.8269503; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8269503/; http://xplorestaging.ieee.org/ielx7/8255109/8268899/08269503.pdf?arnumber=8269503; https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/faculty_research/809; https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1808&context=faculty_research
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know