Optimizing the Impact of Quality Healthcare Improvements within a Federally Qualified Health Clinic (FQHC)
2020
- 557Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage557
- Abstract Views284
- Downloads273
Article Description
This doctoral project’s purpose was geared toward strengthening quality healthcare outcomes documentation by constructing an updated policy and procedure manual specific to quality measures identified above, identifying attitudes and barriers to documenting, and assessing administration willingness to change. The project included a retrospective chart review of three populations and seven healthcare topics. Each diagnosis was researched utilizing specific ICD-10 (see Appendix A). A focus group/Pre-Implementation Questionnaire was administered to a panel of experts consisting of three nurse practitioners with one to nine years of experience employed at the FQHC. Afterward, a focus group was held to discuss barriers and attitudes to current EHR and the current manual. Lastly, eight administrators were given an updated manual and polled online questionnaires to assess the willingness to change and consideration for the adoption of updated executive summaries and policies and procedures. The focus group/administrators' total sample size was 11.The project findings further strengthened the hypothesis of a formatted policy procedure manual will boost incentivized revenue. Guidelines outlined by the Health Resources and Services Administration were utilized for the development of the manual. The manual aligns with the theoretical evidence and may benefit other nurse practitioners and healthcare professionals for implementation.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know