Pole Sports: Considering Stigma
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy
2020
- 18Usage
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage18
- Abstract Views18
Article Description
The Global Association of International Sports Federations (n.d.) granted pole sports Observer Status, and with that, the International Pole Sports Federation (IPSF) took another step towards making the sport an Olympic one. This is controversial amongst the public, scholars, and the pole community itself. Critics such as Charlene Weaving (2020) have argued that poling is sexualized, objectifying, and should not become an Olympic sport. This article utilizes ethnographic data to provide a counterpoint perspective oriented by actor-network theory. A pole is simply a metal apparatus. People interact with objects to create embodied practices. Currently people dance, climb, hang, and move, utilizing metal poles in various styles and contexts, from artistic venues to sporting competitions. Such movements are not inherently erotic nor oppressive. There is evidence that the pole community reflects on issues of sexuality and oppression and that poling provides diverse opportunities for people to express themselves. Rather than be trivialized or stigmatized, pole sports deserves the opportunity for consideration as an Olympic sport.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know